Tulsi Gabbard Explains Why She Believes 9/11 Could Have Been Prevented

Tulsi Gabbard, President Trump’s nominee for director of national intelligence, believes the 9/11 terrorist attacks might have been prevented if intelligence agencies had fully shared information. During her Senate confirmation hearing, she pointed to what she called “stovepiping” within the FBI and CIA as a major cause of government failures.

Key Facts:

  • Tulsi Gabbard told Sen. Roger Wicker that intelligence “stovepiping” contributed to the 9/11 attacks.
  • She said agencies had pertinent information but did not share it broadly.
  • Wicker pressed her on whether cutting bureaucracy might lead to the same problems.
  • Gabbard responded by saying a strong DNI can eliminate wasteful overlap without sacrificing communication.
  • She is President Trump’s pick to lead the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).

The Rest of The Story:

Gabbard testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee, explaining that her main focus is preventing another crisis like 9/11.

She believes the ODNI was created to encourage better intelligence cooperation across multiple agencies.

In her view, the FBI, CIA, and other bodies often held critical information about threats before 9/11, but those pieces were never combined to form a complete warning.

Sen. Wicker asked whether Gabbard’s plan to streamline the DNI might undercut that mission.

Gabbard replied that unnecessary layers of bureaucracy are part of the problem.

She argued that intelligence can be shared effectively if the right leadership is in place, but also pointed out that duplication of tasks may still exist, leading to confusion and the very “stovepiping” that hinders collaboration.

Gabbard’s political journey came under discussion as well.

She served in the U.S. House as a Democrat before leaving the party and endorsing President Trump.

Critics question whether her realignment signals a partisan approach to running the intelligence community.

Supporters counter that she will bring much-needed reform to an office with significant influence over national security policy.

Commentary:

We believe Tulsi Gabbard has identified an important issue in the intelligence community.

History shows that compartmentalized information can lead to serious security failures.

We hope the Senate confirms her so she can begin cutting through the red tape and pushing for improved intelligence-sharing practices.

Her willingness to back the president’s objectives is a plus.

If she can unify competing agencies, the ODNI would be stronger, and we could avoid another terrible attack.

The reality is that reforms are overdue.

Hopefully, she will soon have the authority to see them through.

The Bottom Line:

Tulsi Gabbard insists that ending “stovepiping” across agencies is crucial to preventing future attacks on American soil.

She believes her proposals can trim out unhelpful bureaucratic barriers without sacrificing essential sharing of intelligence.

Whether the Senate approves her plan remains to be seen, but her testimony emphasizes that stronger communication could be key to stopping the next crisis before it begins.

Read Next

Maye Musk Wants Elon to Sue the Media For Defamation And We Hope He Does, Here’s Why…

Dangerous Mexican Cartel Members Caught in Massive Train Heist in Arizona

Oklahoma Board of Education Approves Rule Requiring Parents to Prove Citizenship to Enroll Their Children