Elite universities are pushing back against the Big Beautiful Bill that raises taxes on massive endowments, arguing it will lead to higher tuition. But critics say these wealthy schools have plenty of room to cut costs without punishing students.
Key Facts:
- A new expansion of the 1.4% excise tax on large university endowments became law on July 4, 2025.
- The legislation was passed by Congress and signed by President Donald Trump as part of the Big Beautiful Bill.
- The law applies to schools with large total endowment values, not just those with $500,000+ per student.
- Harvard, Yale, and other elite institutions are protesting the law, warning it could impact tuition and aid.
- The government estimates the tax will raise $2.5 billion over the next decade.
The Rest of The Story:
On July 4, 2025, President Donald Trump signed into law the sweeping fiscal reform Big Beautiful Bill that includes a major change to how elite universities are taxed.
The bill expands the 1.4% excise tax originally created in 2017 to now include more institutions based on total endowment size, not just endowment-per-student thresholds.
This change aims to tap into billions of dollars sitting in university endowments—money that critics argue has gone unaccounted for while tuition costs continue to rise.
The law is projected to raise $2.5 billion over the next ten years.
In response, top schools like Harvard and Yale have issued strong objections.
“Taxing endowments reduces the funds available for student aid, research, and innovation,” Harvard said in a statement.
These institutions argue that the new law will ultimately make higher education less accessible for students.
Commentary:
Elite universities are calling the new tax a burden on students, but it’s worth asking why these schools—some with endowments exceeding $50 billion—can’t absorb a modest tax without raising tuition.
The reality is many of these institutions have become bloated bureaucracies with thousands of administrative roles that add little to actual education.
While students take on debt and parents scramble to pay tuition, these universities continue to add layers of non-teaching staff.
Why does a university need dozens of diversity officers or marketing executives when their main mission is education?
Instead of threatening students with higher costs, these schools should take a hard look at their spending.
They could trim their administrative overhead, scale back non-academic programming, and refocus on core instruction.
Many degree programs are already filled with political and ideological content that does little to prepare students for real-world jobs.
A leaner, more mission-driven university would serve students better and cost less.
This new law might finally pressure schools to cut waste and put learning first.
The Bottom Line:
President Trump’s July 4th signing of the endowment tax expansion law is shaking up the world of elite universities.
The institutions affected say students will pay the price, but their massive endowments and spending patterns tell a different story.
This new tax law could push higher education to trim the fat and get back to its core purpose: teaching.
If they choose to raise tuition anyway, that says more about their priorities than the policy itself.
Read Next
– Trump Admin Sets Its Sights on the Smithsonian For Pushing Divisive Political Narratives
– Illegal Immigrants Facing Massive New Financial Penalties For Refusing to Self-Deport
– Trump Signs Two Executive Orders Prioritizing US Residents Over Foreign Tourists At National Parks
– 144 EPA Officials Put on Immediate Leave After Signing Letter Slamming Trump Administration Policies
– OpenAI Chief Altman SLAMS Democratic Party For Turning Against Capitalism, ‘Politically Homeless’
