Tulsi Gabbard released declassified documents last week alleging the Obama administration manipulated intelligence to justify the Trump–Russia probe. While the revelations are explosive, the major media outlets have mostly ignored or downplayed the story.
Key Facts:
- Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, released declassified documents on Friday alleging Obama-era officials manufactured intelligence in 2016.
- Legacy networks like ABC and NBC failed to cover the story through the weekend; CBS briefly addressed it with a Democrat guest dismissing the claims.
- Gabbard’s report implicates John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, Susan Rice, and Barack Obama.
- Documents show early intelligence did not find evidence of Russia trying to sway the 2016 election through cyber means.
- Critics from CNN, MSNBC, and the New York Times called Gabbard’s findings “baseless,” “dangerous,” or politically motivated.
The Rest of The Story:
Tulsi Gabbard made headlines last week after releasing classified documents suggesting the Obama administration politicized intelligence during the 2016 election cycle.
According to Gabbard, officials created a false narrative that Russia interfered to help Donald Trump win the presidency—despite earlier intelligence saying otherwise.
The report revealed assessments from the intelligence community, before the 2016 election, stating that Russia was “probably not trying… to influence the election by using cyber means.”
Gabbard argues that narrative changed post-election for political reasons.
“Creating this piece of manufactured intelligence… contradicted every other assessment,” she told Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo.
The story was virtually ignored by most major networks.
NBC and ABC did not cover it through Sunday. CBS mentioned it once on Face the Nation, only to feature Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., calling it a “dangerous lie.”
CNN and MSNBC also covered it sparingly—mostly to criticize Gabbard and deflect attention.
John Brennan, who was CIA director in 2016 and is now a paid MSNBC analyst, denounced the report as “very dangerous.”
He claimed it misrepresented the intelligence community’s work.
The New York Times and Washington Post buried the story or framed it as a partisan stunt.
Commentary:
The real story here isn’t just about what Tulsi Gabbard exposed—it’s about how the media reacted. Or rather, how they didn’t.
This should be front-page news. Instead, it’s being swept under the rug by the very same institutions that fueled the original Russia hoax in the first place.
Let’s not forget: The Washington Post and New York Times won Pulitzer Prizes for their so-called “reporting” on Trump–Russia collusion.
Reporting that we now know was based on shaky, politically motivated intelligence.
Now that their narrative is crumbling, they’re hoping no one notices. That’s not journalism. That’s cover-up.
These aren’t just innocent mistakes. They’re willful acts of deceit. The media wasn’t duped—they were complicit.
They laundered misinformation straight from partisan sources to smear a sitting president and delegitimize an election.
It was a coordinated effort to undermine a presidency they didn’t like.
The major networks’ refusal to report fairly on Gabbard’s findings proves their loyalties.
They aren’t watchdogs of the powerful—they’re the attack dogs for one political faction.
MSNBC, CNN, and the rest are more interested in protecting their reputations than revealing the truth.
And look who’s spinning the story—Brennan and Clapper, two of the very people implicated in the documents.
Now paid media pundits, they’re allowed to shape the narrative on networks that profit off their commentary.
It’s the fox guarding the henhouse.
This scandal isn’t just about the Obama administration. It’s about the rot in the Fourth Estate.
The media betrayed their duty to inform the public and now mock those who dare speak the truth.
They should be ashamed. But shame requires integrity—something long absent in legacy newsrooms.
The Bottom Line:
Tulsi Gabbard’s declassified report suggests the 2016 Trump–Russia probe was built on politicized intelligence.
Yet, the same media that pushed the original narrative has responded with silence, deflection, or outright attacks.
Their behavior reveals just how deeply compromised our press has become.
Read Next
– House Republicans Call For Arrests After ‘Russiagate’ Revelations
– Trump May Withhold Approval of New Stadium if Washington Team Doesn’t Change Name Back to ‘Redskins’
– Why The ‘Made in America’ Label May Be More of a Marketing Tool Than Truthful Advertising
– Defense Department Reshapes Two Centuries of Tradition With Pick To Lead U.S Naval Academy