Why The 'Made in America' Label May Be More of a Marketing Tool Than Truthful Advertising

The Trump administration is making major investments in U.S. manufacturing and energy. But while “Made in America” is being promoted, the label may not mean what most Americans think it does.

Key Facts:

President Trump announced a $90 billion investment in energy and artificial intelligence during a visit to Pittsburgh.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) declared July as “Made in the USA” Month.
Only 11% of products sold in the U.S. are actually made by American manufacturers.
Companies can label goods “Made in America” even if most parts come from overseas and are merely assembled in the U.S.
The FTC’s current rule says “all or virtually all” of a product must be American-made, but enforcement is weak.

The Rest of The Story:

President Trump is pushing new investments aimed at revitalizing American industry.

A $90 billion commitment to energy and AI was announced during a visit to Pittsburgh, and the FTC has launched “Made in the USA” Month to promote domestic manufacturing and penalize dishonest labeling.

But despite these efforts, the definition of “Made in America” remains murky.

While Americans often trust that label to mean a product was fully produced at home, many items only receive a small amount of final assembly in the U.S.

The FTC’s vague standard and lax enforcement allow companies to legally market products as domestic, even when key components are sourced abroad.

This labeling confusion is widespread. The solar panel industry, for example, has used American assembly plants to give foreign-made parts the illusion of being U.S.-produced.

The practice not only misleads buyers but also lets companies collect taxpayer-funded subsidies under false pretenses.

Commentary:

The phrase “Made in America” used to carry weight. It meant quality, local jobs, and pride. But today, it’s more of a marketing tool than a truthful statement.

When foreign components are shipped in, minimally assembled here, and then slapped with a patriotic label, it cheats both workers and consumers.

Taxpayer money shouldn’t fund companies gaming the system. Those who do the bare minimum — just enough to meet the weakest interpretation of the rules — are rewarded with incentives meant for true American manufacturing.

It’s unfair and unsustainable. Consumers genuinely want to support U.S. businesses.

But they’re being misled. If they buy a product labeled “Made in America,” it should mean the parts, labor, and value all come from here. Assembly isn’t the same as manufacturing.

That distinction matters. The FTC needs to act. Its current language — “all or virtually all” — sounds strong but lacks clarity.

Without strict rules and enforcement, bad actors will keep finding loopholes. This isn’t just a matter of semantics; it’s about national economic strength and trust.

Trump ran on an “America First” platform, and this is a test of that principle. It’s time to tighten the rules and protect honest companies that do everything right.

Regulators should go beyond education and guidance. Punitive fines should hit companies that lie to the public.

There’s no excuse for pretending imported goods are local just because someone tightened a bolt here.

Tax credits and manufacturing subsidies must be restructured. Only full domestic content should receive full benefits.

No more free passes for shortcuts. American taxpayers deserve better.

And finally, transparency must be the rule. Labels should clearly list where the core components are made. Let Americans decide for themselves.

If companies want to earn “Made in America,” they should build it here, not just brand it here.

The Bottom Line:

Trump’s manufacturing push is commendable, but the FTC’s loose definition of “Made in America” risks undermining those efforts.

American consumers deserve honesty, and U.S. businesses deserve a fair playing field.

If the government won’t enforce meaningful standards, rebuilding domestic industry will remain little more than a slogan.

Why The ‘Made in America’ Label May Be More of a Marketing Tool Than Truthful Advertising

Key Facts:

The Rest of The Story:

Commentary:

The Bottom Line:

Sign Up For The TFPP Wire Newsletter

Read Next