A U.S. Army colonel has been removed from her post after failing to follow protocol at Fort McCoy. The incident centers around missing leadership photos—an omission with serious consequences.
Key Facts: Woke Commander Fired Over Missing Chain of Command Photos
- Col. Sheyla Baez Ramirez was relieved of her duties at Fort McCoy after leadership portraits were not displayed.
- The chain of command board lacked images of President Trump, VP JD Vance, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
- Ramirez was suspended pending an internal Army review; the Army says it’s not tied to “misconduct.”
- Photos were later posted to the board and an official investigation is underway.
- Ramirez had only been commander since July and previously served in high-level Army intelligence roles.
The Rest of the Story: Fort McCoy Commander Suspended After Protocol Breach
Col. Sheyla Baez Ramirez, the garrison commander at Fort McCoy, was suspended after her base failed to display official portraits of the president, vice president, and defense secretary.
The portraits are required as part of a chain of command display seen across military installations.
Their absence triggered a response from the Department of Defense, which launched an investigation.
The suspension came shortly after images circulated showing blank spaces where the portraits of President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth should have been.
A DOD social media post confirmed that the issue was corrected and that a formal probe was in progress.
Commentary: Why the Army Had No Choice But to Fire Ramirez
Military order depends on structure, discipline, and unwavering loyalty to the chain of command.
By allowing such a public and visible breach of that tradition, Col. Ramirez created unnecessary controversy and weakened trust within the ranks.
Every soldier, from private to colonel, understands that the display of leadership photos isn’t optional—it’s symbolic of loyalty and duty.
Failing to uphold that basic standard sends a dangerous message to subordinates that political bias can outweigh military protocol.
It can’t.
And it shouldn’t.
Ramirez’s track record in Army intelligence might be impressive on paper, but leadership is about setting the example.
The omission wasn’t a clerical error—it was an unmistakable signal of disregard.
Whether intentional or not, that signal undermines civilian leadership of the military, a bedrock of our republic.
If a commander won’t even acknowledge who their leaders are, how can they be trusted to carry out lawful orders from the top?
The Army didn’t just have the right to relieve her—it had a duty to do so.
Her continued presence would have eroded respect for the office of the president and the command structure every soldier swears to obey.
She should never again be allowed to lead troops.
There are plenty of capable officers who understand the seriousness of their position.
The military doesn’t need individuals who bring political agendas into uniform.
The Bottom Line: Why Military Loyalty Must Come First
The Army’s decision to remove Col. Ramirez sends a clear message: loyalty to the chain of command is non-negotiable.
Commanders set the tone for their units, and even small acts of defiance can have big consequences.
Discipline and structure are what hold the military together.
The incident at Fort McCoy was a warning sign—and the Army was right to act decisively.
Read Next
– House Democrats Wanting to Go To El Salvador To Check On Gang Members Just Got Bad News
– President Trump Signs EO to Lower Cost of Wide Range of Prescription Medications
– College Student Who Set Fire To Two Cybertrucks Just Learned He Made a BIG Mistake
– Hollywood Exodus Accelerates as Los Angeles Set to Become ‘The New Detroit’
– Associated Press Gets Smacked Down By a Federal Judge in Dispute With The Trump Administration