Joe Biden’s White House Doctor Under Investigation For Lying To The American People

By /

Congress is now investigating Dr. Kevin O’Connor, President Biden’s longtime physician, over allegations that he misled the public about Biden’s health while the president suffered from serious cognitive and physical decline.

The inquiry raises troubling questions about medical ethics, government transparency, and the need for independent health evaluations of sitting presidents.

Key Facts:

  • Rep. James Comer (R-KY) sent a letter to Dr. Kevin O’Connor on May 23, 2025, as part of an ongoing investigation into his medical evaluations of President Joe Biden.
  • The probe follows Biden’s reported stage 4 prostate cancer diagnosis and observed cognitive decline during and after the 2024 presidential debates.
  • O’Connor publicly stated in February 2024 that Biden was a “healthy, active, robust 81-year-old male” fit to serve.
  • Congress is also examining whether O’Connor’s financial ties to the Biden family influenced his assessments.
  • The Committee has asked Dr. O’Connor to appear for a transcribed interview on June 25, 2025.

The Rest of The Story:

Dr. Kevin O’Connor, who served as President Biden’s personal physician since 2009, is under scrutiny by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Chairman James Comer alleges that O’Connor may have misled the public about Biden’s physical and mental health during his presidency.

These concerns intensified after Biden’s performance in the 2024 presidential debate and subsequent revelations about his stage 4 prostate cancer diagnosis.

The committee’s investigation centers on whether O’Connor’s relationship with the Biden family—possibly financial—compromised the objectivity of his health assessments.

Special Counsel Robert Hur’s interview with Biden also suggested signs of mental decline, adding urgency to the inquiry.

Congress is now debating if legislation should mandate independent medical evaluations of the president, using authority granted under Section 4 of the 25th Amendment.

Commentary:

Dr. O’Connor’s 2024 assessment of President Biden as “fit to execute the duties of the Presidency” raises serious doubts.

It’s difficult to reconcile that statement with the advanced cancer diagnosis and Biden’s visible mental decline in public appearances and interviews.

If O’Connor knowingly misrepresented Biden’s condition, then his role as a physician—and as a public servant—demands thorough examination.

Medical professionals hold a sacred trust, especially when serving the highest office in the land.

If O’Connor’s assessments were politically motivated or influenced by personal loyalty or financial incentives, that’s not just unethical—it could be criminal.

At minimum, his license should be on the line.

If deliberate deception occurred, charges of fraud or worse should follow.

This episode also represents a dangerous flaw in how presidential health is evaluated.

When a doctor reports directly to the president, rather than Congress or an independent panel, the risk of biased or politically convenient evaluations increases dramatically.

The country cannot afford this kind of conflict of interest.

We saw similar problems during past administrations.

But this case is different due to the severity of the health issues and the global importance of American leadership.

It’s not about partisan politics—it’s about national security and public trust.

The American people deserve truth from their leaders—and from those who serve them in medical roles.

The stakes are simply too high.

Congress is right to investigate, and the findings should lead to firm accountability and systemic reform.

The Twenty-Fifth Amendment was designed for moments like this.

It’s time to use it not just reactively, but proactively, to ensure presidential fitness isn’t decided behind closed doors.

The Bottom Line:

Dr. O’Connor’s assessments of President Biden’s health are now at the center of a congressional investigation.

If he lied about Biden’s condition, he may have misled the nation during a critical period.

Congress is taking steps to ensure that future evaluations of presidential health are handled independently.

Transparency, not loyalty, must guide how a president’s fitness is judged.

Sign Up For The TFPP Wire Newsletter

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You may opt out at any time.

Read Next

– Trump Administration Slams Judge Who Blocked Deportation of Convicted Felons, Including Sexual Assault of Disabled Woman

– RFK Jr’s Highly Anticipated MAHA Report Drops And What They Found Is Even Worse Than We Expected

– Proposed New Law Would Block Foreign Adversaries Trying to Buy US Real Estate

– Tariffs Trigger Reshoring Boom: 90% of U.S. Companies Shifting Production Back Home

– Jill Biden Accused of Elder Abuse By Washington Post Columnist