A deportation flight carrying violent criminals was halted after a Massachusetts judge ordered the Trump administration to maintain control of the individuals in case their removals were deemed unlawful. DHS and Trump officials are pushing back hard.
Key Facts:
- A Massachusetts federal judge paused the deportation of eight illegal immigrants, all convicted of violent crimes.
- One deportee, Nyo Myint, a Burmese national, was convicted of attempting to rape a disabled woman with the mental capacity of a 3-year-old.
- The judge, Brian Murphy, ordered that the men remain in government custody in case their return to the U.S. is required.
- DHS and Trump officials condemned the ruling, calling it politically motivated and harmful to public safety.
- President Trump urged the Supreme Court to stop activist judges from interfering with immigration enforcement.
The Rest of The Story:
Judge Brian Murphy issued a late-night ruling requiring the Trump administration to maintain custody of eight deported individuals, including some already en route to South Sudan.
The order applies to illegal immigrants already convicted of crimes such as murder, child rape, and robbery.
DHS highlighted the case of Nyo Myint, a Burmese illegal immigrant convicted of sexually assaulting a severely mentally disabled woman.
Nyo MYINT, a citizen of Burma was arrested by ICE on February 18, 2025. MYINT is convicted of first-degree sexual assault involving a victim mentally and physically incapable of resisting; sentenced to 12 years confinement. MYINT is also charged with aggravated assault-nonfamily… pic.twitter.com/4U0J1iRyIc
— Homeland Security (@DHSgov) May 21, 2025
DHS stated Myint and the others had final removal orders, yet the judge’s decision may now require their return to the U.S. if he finds the deportations unlawful.
McLaughlin, a DHS official, called the judge’s order “deranged” and emphasized that these individuals are dangerous and had exhausted all legal appeals.
Nyo MYINT, a citizen of Burma was arrested by ICE on February 18, 2025. MYINT is convicted of first-degree sexual assault involving a victim mentally and physically incapable of resisting; sentenced to 12 years confinement. MYINT is also charged with aggravated assault-nonfamily… pic.twitter.com/4U0J1iRyIc
— Homeland Security (@DHSgov) May 21, 2025
The White House also slammed the move, saying it interferes with national sovereignty and public safety.
Commentary:
This ruling defies all logic.
These individuals were not rounded up at random—they were all tried, convicted, and issued final removal orders after due process.
Every person on that plane had committed heinous crimes, from murder to the rape of children and disabled individuals.
They are not U.S. citizens. There is no legal or moral reason to keep them here.
When a judge decides to override the executive branch’s clear legal authority to deport foreign nationals who’ve committed violent crimes, it begs the question: Who benefits?
It’s certainly not the victims or the American people.
These decisions are clearly driven more by politics than law.
What kind of nation allows foreign murderers and child rapists to stay on its soil because a federal judge thinks it might be “unlawful” to deport them—even after every legal process has concluded?
This is a grotesque abuse of judicial discretion.
It’s not just a policy disagreement—it’s a breakdown in constitutional order.
The President has the authority and obligation to protect the homeland. That power is now being undermined by unelected judges who appear more concerned with ideology than justice.
If judges face no consequences for these actions, the integrity of our legal system is at risk.
There must be accountability. Otherwise, we’ll continue seeing the same activist rulings that make our streets less safe and put our communities at risk.
The courts are not supposed to be super-legislatures. Their role is to interpret the law, not dictate immigration policy.
This ruling is just another example of judicial overreach being used to block commonsense protections for Americans.
The Bottom Line:
A federal judge’s ruling halted the deportation of some of the worst criminal offenders imaginable, triggering outrage from DHS and President Trump.
The case illustrates how activist decisions can override national security concerns and frustrate lawful deportations.
If this trend continues, the courts will further erode the executive branch’s authority to protect American citizens.
The Supreme Court may soon have to intervene to restore balance.
Read Next
Chicago Mayor Brags About Hiring Only Blacks, Immediately Gets Hit With Major DOJ Investigation
Reporter Threatened, Stories Killed: Inside the Biden Health Cover-Up and the Complicit Press
Marco Rubio Flattens Van Hollen After Senator Says He Regretted Voting For Him as Sec State’
Red State Bans The Purchase of Soda or Energy Drinks With Food Stamps
Another Major Car Company Announces Plans to Scale Back on EV Production