A judge in Florida ruled in favor of former President Donald Trump, denying a request from Pulitzer Prize board members to temporarily halt his defamation lawsuit against them. Trump is suing over the board’s decision to award the 2018 National Reporting prize to The New York Times and The Washington Post for their now-discredited reporting on alleged collusion between his campaign and Russia.
Key Facts:
- Trump filed a defamation lawsuit in 2022 against the Pulitzer Prize Board over its 2018 award to The New York Times and The Washington Post for coverage of the “Russia collusion” allegations.
- The Pulitzer Board sought a temporary stay, arguing Trump’s presidential duties should take precedence over the lawsuit.
- Judge Robert L. Pegg denied the request, stating Trump could seek relief if the case interfered with his duties.
- Trump’s legal team called the stay request an attempt to delay the case and avoid evidence disclosure.
- The Pulitzer Board stands by its decision, calling Trump’s lawsuit “troubling” for press freedoms.
The Rest of The Story:
Trump’s lawsuit challenges the credibility of the Pulitzer Prize Board for rewarding coverage that relied on claims later debunked by the Mueller investigation and DOJ reports.
Despite calls for the 2018 awards to be revoked, the Pulitzer Board refused, maintaining that the reporting met journalistic standards.
Judge Pegg’s ruling removes a legal hurdle, allowing Trump’s lawsuit to move forward.
His legal team views this as a victory in holding media institutions accountable for spreading misinformation.
Meanwhile, the Pulitzer Board insists on defending journalism and evaluating next steps in response to the lawsuit.
Commentary:
The Pulitzer Prize Board’s refusal to rescind the 2018 award exposes its blatant partisanship.
The Russia collusion story was proven false, yet the Times and Post were rewarded for pushing a narrative that misled the public.
By refusing to correct their mistake, the Pulitzer Board signaled that political bias outweighs journalistic integrity.
Trump’s lawsuit highlights a broader issue: mainstream media outlets repeatedly push falsehoods, suffer no consequences, and even receive accolades.
If the Pulitzer Board truly valued journalistic standards, it would have revoked the award once the Russia hoax collapsed under scrutiny.
Instead, it chose to stand by its decision, reinforcing the perception that major media institutions operate as political activists rather than objective reporters.
The judge’s ruling is a win for Trump, but more importantly, it’s a step toward accountability.
For years, corporate media has smeared political opponents with impunity.
If Trump’s lawsuit forces even a modicum of accountability, it will be a victory not just for him, but for the American people who deserve honest reporting.
The Bottom Line:
Trump’s lawsuit against the Pulitzer Board moves forward after a judge rejected the board’s request to delay proceedings.
The case underscores the deep credibility crisis facing media institutions that refuse to correct discredited narratives.
Whether or not Trump wins in court, the Pulitzer Board has already lost in the eyes of the public.
Read Next
– Trump Hits Canada HARD After They Place a 25% Tariff on Electricity, Offers a Way Out
– Southwest Air Makes Huge Change, It’s the End of an Era
– Reps Anna Paulina Luna and AOC Team Up to Push Credit Card Bill