President Trump has signed an executive order banning or restricting travel from nearly 20 countries considered high-risk due to terrorism, poor border controls, or failure to share threat information with U.S. agencies.
Key Facts:
- President Trump signed Executive Order 14161, imposing travel restrictions on 19 countries.
- 12 nations, including Afghanistan, Iran, Somalia, Libya, and Yemen, face full travel bans.
- Seven additional countries, such as Venezuela, Cuba, and Laos, face partial restrictions.
- The countries listed are accused of harboring terrorists, overusing visas, or not cooperating with U.S. security efforts.
- The order is framed as a national security measure aimed at preventing foreign threats from entering the U.S.
The Rest of The Story:
The executive order, signed by President Trump, blocks or limits travel from 19 nations identified as security threats.
The restrictions target countries with high rates of visa abuse, terrorism concerns, or a refusal to share identity and threat data with U.S. agencies.
“President Trump is fulfilling his promise to protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm,” said Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson in a statement to Fox News Digital.
Among the affected nations, Afghanistan stands out with a student visa overstay rate of 29.3% and governance by the Taliban.
Iran is designated a state sponsor of terror, while Libya, Somalia, and Yemen lack stable governments capable of securing passports or managing threat information.
BREAKING: President Trump releases video statement following his decision to ban entry into the United States from 12 countries.
Seven other countries have partial restrictions.
The 12 countries with full travel restrictions are: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of the… pic.twitter.com/LywxQ7XPzi
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) June 5, 2025
Commentary:
This is a long-overdue step to restore sanity to our immigration and border policy.
The president’s decision puts American safety first, targeting countries that either can’t or won’t provide basic security cooperation.
These aren’t random bans based on politics or race.
They’re grounded in data—like Afghanistan’s nearly 30% visa overstay rate and Iran’s refusal to cooperate with American authorities.
The Taliban and Tehran aren’t just hostile; they’re dangerous.
The partial restrictions on countries like Venezuela and Cuba show the administration is being strategic, not indiscriminate.
Some nations are hostile, but still have limited frameworks in place—hence, they face lighter restrictions than places like Yemen.
Despite howls from open-borders activists, these are sensible guardrails that should’ve been in place long ago.
The Obama and Biden administrations’ negligence left the door wide open.
Now, it’s finally being shut.
Of course, we can expect a left-wing judge to intervene within 24 hours.
This has become a predictable pattern—common sense policy gets blocked in court by an unelected ideologue.
If and when that happens, Trump should stay the course.
This isn’t a debate over feelings or fairness.
It’s about protecting Americans. Period.
The courts have no constitutional authority to override the president’s clear national security powers in this case.
Let’s be honest—if there’s another attack and it turns out the suspect came from a country like Iran or Somalia, these same critics will be screaming about intelligence failures.
Trump’s simply choosing to prevent the threat before it happens.
The Bottom Line:
President Trump’s new travel restrictions focus on countries with known ties to terrorism, poor governance, or refusal to work with U.S. authorities.
The order is data-driven and rooted in national security.
Expect legal pushback from activist judges, but this is a clear case where the executive branch must stand firm.
The safety of American citizens comes first.
Read Next
– California Moves 200 Bar Exam Takers From Fail To Pass After Adjusting The Scores
– Massive Oil Reserve Back in Play After Trump Lifts Biden Clampdown
– Federal Court Forces Taxpayers to Fund Inmate Gender Transitions
– DOJ Launches Probe Into Biden Auto-Pen Pardons, May Move To Void Them