The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Trump administration, allowing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to access sensitive Social Security data. This marks a significant victory for the administration’s oversight efforts.
Key Facts:
- The Supreme Court ruled in favor of DOGE accessing Social Security systems, overturning a Maryland judge’s restriction.
- DOGE, formerly led by Elon Musk, targets waste and fraud across federal agencies, with Social Security flagged as a key area.
- Judge Ellen Hollander previously allowed limited, anonymous access under strict guidelines, calling DOGE’s actions a “fishing expedition.”
- The lawsuit was filed by labor unions and retirees through Democracy Forward, with concerns over privacy and data misuse.
- Three liberal justices dissented from the ruling, while conservative justices emphasized no evidence of wrongdoing by DOGE.
The Rest of The Story:
The Supreme Court on Friday lifted a lower court order that had restricted the Department of Government Efficiency from accessing data from the Social Security Administration.
This data includes extensive personal information such as medical history, education records, and income.
The Trump administration had argued that DOGE, a government watchdog once led by Elon Musk, could not function effectively under the Maryland judge’s rules.
The judge had allowed limited, anonymous access only to staff with background checks or a demonstrated need.
Musk has publicly criticized Social Security, calling it a “Ponzi scheme” and claiming it’s plagued with fraud.
Solicitor General John Sauer called the Maryland judge’s order an example of judicial overreach.
The appeals court had previously upheld the restrictions in a split ruling, with conservative judges dissenting and pointing out that there was no evidence DOGE had misused data.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court rules the Department of Government Efficiency *can* have unlimited access to Social Security Administration data of millions of Americans while a legal dispute over the access plays out. The liberals dissent. #SCOTUS https://t.co/IHtxk6VT3M pic.twitter.com/2qQUqewhpL
— Katie Buehler (@bykatiebuehler) June 6, 2025
Commentary:
The Supreme Court’s decision is a win for taxpayers who demand accountability from bloated federal programs.
DOGE was created to cut through government waste, and blocking its access to essential data cripples its ability to do so.
Social Security, one of the largest government expenditures, deserves close inspection.
If there’s widespread fraud or inefficiency, DOGE needs unrestricted access to find it.
Suggesting otherwise only protects the status quo.
Those worried about data privacy overlook the fact that DOGE staffers are vetted and operate within government protocols—just like any agency with access to sensitive data.
If data is mishandled, those responsible would face consequences like in any other department.
Claims that DOGE’s efforts amount to a “fishing expedition” miss the bigger picture.
The agency isn’t randomly snooping; it’s trying to uncover real problems in a deeply entrenched system.
Shielding Social Security from oversight only raises more questions.
The judiciary should not be micromanaging executive branch efforts to streamline and reform government operations.
That’s especially true when no evidence of wrongdoing has been found and when DOGE has already produced results by cutting waste elsewhere.
In a time when trust in federal agencies is low, the role of an independent oversight group like DOGE is more important than ever.
Bureaucracy shouldn’t be allowed to protect itself from scrutiny.
What are opponents afraid DOGE will find?
If there’s nothing to hide, transparency should be welcome.
Real reform requires access—and the Court made the right call to uphold that principle.
The Bottom Line:
The Supreme Court ruled that DOGE must be allowed access to Social Security data to fulfill its oversight mission.
This decision strengthens efforts to reduce government waste and brings common sense back to accountability.
Concerns over data misuse remain speculative, while the need for transparency and fiscal responsibility is clear.
Read Next
U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro Moves to Jail Woman Who Spit on Ed Martin For Violating Terms of Release
White House Pushes Aggressive New Plan to Expel Illegal Immigrants