A transgender registered sex offender in Virginia, Richard Cox, is facing multiple charges after allegedly exposing himself in a women’s locker room. Cox argues that restricting his access to female facilities is a violation of his civil rights, despite his history of sex offenses.
Key Facts:
- Richard Cox, 58, a transgender registered sex offender, was confronted by Fairfax County police on Nov. 16 after allegedly exposing himself in a women’s locker room.
- Cox compared restrictions on his access to public facilities to racial segregation.
- Despite identifying as a woman, court documents list Cox as male.
- Fairfax County initiated the process of banning Cox from all county rec centers upon discovering his criminal record.
- Cox faces over 20 charges for multiple incidents of indecent exposure at a fitness center and high school.
The Rest of The Story:
Police body cam footage, released on Feb. 16, captured Cox defending his presence in a women’s locker room, insisting that using his name on the sex offender registry to restrict him was “criminal misuse” of the law.
Cox likened the situation to past racial discrimination, arguing that his gender identity entitled him to use women’s restrooms and changing areas.
Despite being confronted by police, Cox was not charged for the incident at the Oakmont Rec Center.
However, months earlier, Virginia mother Jen McDougal reported Cox exposing himself in a women’s locker room in Arlington while her 9-year-old daughter was present.
Staff reportedly told her nothing could be done due to Cox’s transgender status.
Authorities have since charged Cox with over 20 offenses tied to multiple allegations of indecent exposure at various locations, including a fitness center and high school.
A preliminary hearing is set for March.
Commentary:
This case is not about civil rights—it’s about public safety.
A registered sex offender with a history of indecent exposure should never have access to women’s locker rooms or restrooms, no matter how they identify.
The argument that barring Cox from female spaces is equivalent to racial segregation is both absurd and offensive.
Sex offender registries exist for a reason: to prevent repeat offenses and protect the public.
Cox’s attempt to manipulate the system by hiding behind gender identity is a slap in the face to real victims.
The fact that he was not immediately charged for exposing himself in a locker room filled with women and children is a glaring example of how far radical policies have gone in undermining basic safety standards.
This is not a civil rights issue—it’s about common sense.
Women and children deserve protection from predators, and Cox has already proven he cannot be trusted in female spaces.
The justice system needs to act decisively and ensure he is held accountable for his crimes.
The tide is turning on this type of insanity.
The public is no longer willing to tolerate policies that prioritize the feelings of offenders over the rights of law-abiding citizens.
Cox should be in prison, not debating his “rights” to access vulnerable spaces.
The Bottom Line:
A convicted sex offender should never have access to women’s locker rooms, regardless of gender identity.
Cox’s argument that banning him violates his civil rights is a dangerous distortion of the law.
With over 20 charges pending, it’s time for the justice system to put public safety first and ensure he faces the full consequences of his actions.
Read Next
– Former USAID Headquarters Has a New Tenant
– Iconic Retail Chain Closing Down All U.S. Stores One Month After Filing Chapter 11
r and high school. A preliminary hearing is set for March.