Twenty One Federal Workers Resign After Clashing With DOGE

Twenty-one federal employees resigned from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) rather than assist with Trump’s workforce reduction efforts, claiming they refused to compromise government systems. The White House dismissed their protest, affirming the administration’s commitment to trimming federal bureaucracy.

Key Facts:

21 staffers from DOGE, including engineers and data scientists, resigned in opposition to Trump’s workforce reduction plan.
The group claimed they would not use their skills to “compromise core government systems” or dismantle public services.
The employees were initially part of the U.S. Digital Service, an office created under Obama after the Healthcare.gov debacle.
DOGE, led by Elon Musk, is spearheading federal workforce cuts to improve efficiency and eliminate wasteful spending.
The White House dismissed the resignations, stating that lawsuits and protests will not deter Trump from carrying out his agenda.

The Rest of The Story:

The 21 resigning employees sent a joint letter criticizing DOGE’s hiring process and the administration’s approach to government efficiency.

They accused interviewers of questioning political loyalty and claimed the new direction of DOGE threatened security and public services.

These departures follow an earlier round of layoffs in which 40 employees were let go, reducing DOGE’s staff to 44 members.

The mass resignations highlight broader resistance to the Trump administration’s push to reduce the federal workforce and eliminate unnecessary government programs.

Commentary:

For Trump and Musk, these resignations are a win.

Any federal worker unwilling to execute the administration’s directives should not be in government service.

In the private sector, employees who refuse to follow leadership decisions don’t get to simply keep their jobs—they get replaced.

Government should function the same way.

This is especially true when the goal is efficiency.

The federal government has grown bloated with bureaucratic redundancy, and DOGE’s mission is to streamline operations.

Those who refuse to participate in that effort are essentially working against taxpayers’ interests.

It’s also revealing that many of the resigning employees came from the Obama-era U.S. Digital Service.

This agency was created to fix a massive government failure—Healthcare.gov’s disastrous rollout—yet its members now protest against fixing inefficiency elsewhere in government.

Trump’s White House made it clear: protests and legal challenges won’t stop them.

The American people elected Trump to cut waste, and these resignations just make his job easier.

Rather than having to fire uncooperative staffers, they took themselves out of the equation.

The Bottom Line:

These resignations are not a setback for the administration but a confirmation that reform is needed.

Trump and Musk are moving forward with government downsizing, and those unwilling to adapt have chosen to leave.

That’s exactly how government should work—accountable to the people, not entrenched bureaucrats.